Category: Archives

Finding Refuge at Last (Age 42)

“I AM come from the court of King Vishtaspa.”
— Zarathustra, finally finding refuge

---

For 12 Years, Zarathustra Had No Power

Then one king believed.

Within a decade, an empire followed.

---

The Divine Instruction (Age 42)

After 12 years of wandering—

After 12 years of rejection—

After 12 years of crying out “Whither shall I go?”—

Finally, the answer came.

Later, in the same chapter, he gives the answer of the god who sends him to preach his vision in the land of the king Vishtaspa.

“Go to Vishtaspa.”

Not a great empire. Not a wealthy kingdom. Not a famous ruler.

Just a king in Bactria—modern Afghanistan and eastern Iran region.

King Vishtaspa ruled a relatively modest kingdom in Bactria or Chorasmia (regions that are now part of Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan).

But this king—this one man’s belief—would change everything.

---

The Journey to Bactria

Time went by and Zarathushtra was now 42 years old. One day Zarathushtra received news that gave him hope. He had heard about a wise and just king named Vishtaspa who ruled in a nearby land.

After 12 years of doors slammed in his face, Zarathustra heard about a king who was:

• Wise (not easily manipulated)
• Just (concerned with truth and fairness)
• Open (willing to listen to new ideas)

Zarathushtra thought that the king would be wise enough to listen to him and therefore, he and his followers did not hesitate to visit this king.

By this point, Zarathustra had perhaps 22 followers. His cousin. A handful of believers.

That’s all.

Twenty-two people against an entire world of opposition.

Once again, they were on their way.

One last journey. One last attempt. One last hope.

---

The Arrival at Vishtaspa’s Court

When they reached the royal court of king Vishtaspa, he accepted Zarathushtra’s visit and invited him to his residence.

The first good sign: The king actually granted him an audience.

After 12 years of being expelled, driven out, imprisoned, hunted—

Someone was willing to listen.

The king had granted Zarathushtra an audience with priests and counselors to listen to his philosophy and if necessary, initiate a debate.

---

The Great Debate

When Zoroaster arrived at Vishtaspa’s court, the prophet was “met with hostility from the kayags and karabs (kavis and karapans), with whom he disputed at a great assembly.”

The same old enemies: The priestly class.

Vishtaspa must have had his own priests and seers, who would hardly have welcomed a new prophet claiming divine authority.

Of course not.

Because Zarathustra was saying—again:

• “Your gods are demons”
• “Your sacrifices are unnecessary”
• “Your power is illegitimate”

The priests at Vishtaspa’s court saw the same threat their predecessors had seen for 12 years:

Economic ruin. Loss of authority. Obsolescence.

The 33 Questions

As expected, Zarathushtra received numerous questions from the audience and he had convincing answers for all of them.

The tradition says Zarathustra debated for three days.

Question after question. Challenge after challenge. Argument after argument.

And one by one, Zarathustra answered them all.

Not with miracles. Not with signs. Not with supernatural displays.

With truth.

With logic. With coherence. With the simple, devastating power of his message:

• One God (simpler than polytheism)
• Free will (more empowering than fate)
• Ethics over ritual (more accessible than blood sacrifice)
• “Good thoughts, words, deeds” (more practical than complex ceremonies)

The tradition goes on to relate that Zoroaster triumphed after three days of debate.

King Vishtaspa became very impressed by the wisdom of Zarathushtra.

Finally. After 22 years. Someone believed.

---

The Plot (Prison)

But the victory was short-lived.

Even though Zarathushtra had convinced many about his philosophy, his popularity in the royal court created enemies.

The karapans (priests) and karabs saw that the king was leaning toward conversion.

They had to act fast.

Little did Zarathushtra know that a few priests had planned a plot against him.

The Frame

The priests had placed objects related to black magic in Zarathushtra’s room at the king’s residence and they then told Vishtaspa to search his room.

Black magic paraphernalia. Planted evidence.

When Vishtaspa found the objects, he accused Zarathushtra of blasphemy and imprisoned him while denying him food and water.

After three days of brilliant debate—prison.

Zoroaster triumphed after three days of debate, only to be maligned by his enemies to Vishtaspa, who then had the prophet imprisoned.

The priests whispered: “He’s a sorcerer. He deceived you with dark arts. The objects in his room prove it.”

And Vishtaspa—not yet fully convinced, swayed by his trusted advisors—believed them.

Zarathustra was thrown in prison.

No food. No water. Left to die.

After 12 years of searching for refuge.

After finally finding a king willing to listen.

After winning the debate.

Prison.

---

The Miracle: The King’s Horse

One day, the beloved black horse of Vishtaspa caught an incurable disease and no physician could cure the horse.

King Vishtaspa’s favorite horse was suddenly paralyzed.

The king summoned the best healers in the land, but no one could cure his horse. He then prayed to the gods day and night and sacrificed a thousand horses and camels for them.

The old gods didn’t answer.

A thousand sacrifices. Endless prayers to the daeva. The most skilled physicians.

Nothing worked.

The horse’s legs became smaller and weaker each day so that he could no longer stand on his feet.

The Offer

While in prison, Zarathushtra heard about the dying horse and he offered his help.

From a prison cell. Denied food and water. Falsely accused.

Zarathustra offered to help the king who had imprisoned him.

Zarathushtra went to the King and said, “I can cure your horse, but first you should grant my four wishes.”

Four conditions:

1. That Vishtaspa accept the religion of Ahura Mazda
2. That Crown Prince Isfendiar accept the religion
3. That Queen Hutaosa accept the religion
4. That those who framed Zarathustra be punished

Vishtaspa reluctantly gave Zarathushtra the opportunity.

The king was desperate. His beloved horse was dying. The old gods had failed.

What did he have to lose?

The Healing

By his surprise, Zarathushtra managed to cure the horse.

But, from prison, Zoroaster cured one of Vishtaspa’s favourite horses (which had suddenly become paralyzed), for which the prophet then gained Vishtaspa’s support and admiration.

The horse stood. The paralysis vanished.

Not through sacrifice to the daevas.

Not through priestly rituals.

But through the power of Ahura Mazda working through Zarathustra.

This event caused Vishtaspa to realize that he had been wrong and he fully accepted the Zoroastrian faith.

---

The Conversion

After a few days of thinking, he decided to convert.

King Vishtaspa—after seeing:

• Zarathustra’s wisdom in debate (three days)
• The falseness of the accusation (planted evidence)
• The failure of the old gods (despite a thousand sacrifices)
• The power of Ahura Mazda (healing the paralyzed horse)

—converted to Zoroastrianism.

Vishtaspa, according to Zoroastrian tradition, became the first convert.

Actually the first influential convert. (The first overall was Zarathustra’s cousin.)

But Vishtaspa was a king.

And since he was a king, others quickly followed.

Queen Hutaosa

The beautiful Hutaosa became one of Zarathustra’s greatest supporters and assisted him in converting Vishtaspa.

Queen Hutaosa didn’t just convert—she became an evangelist.

She helped persuade her husband. She promoted the faith throughout the court. She used her influence to spread the message.

In Yasht 9.25–26, the prophet makes the same appeal with regard to Hutaosa, wife of Vishtaspa.

The Gathas themselves mention her—a woman honored in the most sacred texts.

This was revolutionary. In ancient times, women were rarely credited in religious texts.

But Zarathustra’s teaching included: There is also a heavy emphasis on spreading happiness, mostly through charity, and respecting the spiritual equality and duty of both men and women.

Spiritual equality. Both men and women.

Queen Hutaosa embodied this principle.

The Court Converts

Zarathushtra then established close ties with the family of the king and queen, whose sons were named Frashaoshtra and Jamaspa.

Not just the king. The entire royal family.

Frashaoshtra and Jamaspa—the king’s brothers—became Zarathustra’s allies.

In the Gathas, the poet speaks of Vishtaspa as his ally (Yasna 46.14), follower of the path of Vohu Manah (Y. 51.16), and committed to spreading the prophet’s message (Y. 51.16, 46.15, 53.2).

Vishtaspa became committed to spreading the message.

Not just believing—actively evangelizing.

---

The Aftermath: Justice and Integration

He punished the subjects who had plotted against Zarathushtra and he made Zoroastrianism the state religion of his land.

The priests who framed Zarathustra? Punished.

The religion? Made official.

This turning point resulted in the spreading of Zoroastrianism to neighboring lands and the establishment of Zoroastrianism as a world religion during ancient times.

The Family Ties

Frashaoshtra’s daughter, Hvovi, would become Zarathushtra’s wife.

The king’s brother’s daughter became Zarathustra’s wife.

Zarathushtra married into the royal family.

The two would have six children: three daughters, Freni, Friti, and Pourucista, and three sons, Isat Vastar, Uruvat-Nara, and Hvare Cithra.

And then: Zarathushtra’s daughter, Pourucista, would become the wife of the king’s son, Jamaspa.

Complete integration.

Zarathustra’s family and Vishtaspa’s family became one family.

The prophet who had been rejected by his own kinsmen—

Found a new family in the king’s court.

---

The Vision Confirmed: The Three Archangels

But Vishtaspa required one final sign before he would totally embrace the faith. He asked to be shown what role he would play in the heaven-world.

After two years of gradual conversion—

After the healing of the horse—

After Queen Hutaosa’s persuasion—

Vishtaspa wanted confirmation.

Not doubt. But divine validation.

The Arrival

In response, Ahura Mazda sent three archangels to the court of Vishtaspa and Hutaosa.

They appeared as effulgent knights in full armour, riding on horseback.

Three beings of light. In armor. On horseback.

According to one text, they arrived in such glory that “their radiance in that lofty residence seemed … a heaven of complete light, owing to their great power and triumph.”

The king looked upon them—and trembled.

“All his courtiers trembled, all his chieftains were confused.”

This was divine confirmation.

The Message

Radiating a blinding light and the sound of thunder, they announced that they had come on behalf of Ahura Mazda in order that the king might receive the fullness of the message of Zarathustra.

They promised Vishtaspa:

• A life span of 150 years
• An immortal son (with Hutaosa)

The archangels warned, however, that if Vishtaspa should decide not to take up the religion, his end would not be far away.

Choose Asha—live long and prosper.

Reject it—and die soon.

Not a threat. A consequence.

Because alignment with truth (Asha) brings life.

Alignment with lies (Druj) brings death.

That’s cosmic law.

---

The Transformation

After this final vision, Vishtaspa was fully converted.

At first Zoroastrianism was as much a military order as a religion, since its members were forced to fight persecution (mistreatment towards a person or group because of differences) and fend off attacks from other tribes.

Zoroastrianism became the state religion.

Not just tolerated. Not just permitted.

Official. Established. Protected.

And with the king’s backing, the faith spread:

• To neighboring lands
• To allied kingdoms
• Across Bactria and beyond

Within a generation, Zoroastrianism would become the faith of the Persian Empire—the largest empire the world had ever seen.

---

Why This Moment Changed Everything

1. Royal Patronage = Institutional Power

For 12 years, Zarathustra had truth but no power.

After Vishtaspa’s conversion, he had truth AND power.

The difference:

• Before: Preaching in villages, driven out by local priests
• After: Protected by the king, establishing fire temples, training priests

One king’s belief created infrastructure for the message.

2. The Pattern: Truth Needs a Platform

Jesus: Preached for 3 years, killed, but then Constantine (Roman Emperor) converts → Christianity spreads

Muhammad: Preached in Mecca (rejected), fled to Medina (accepted) → base of power → Islam spreads

Buddha: Wandered for years, but conversion of King Bimbisara → Buddhism spreads

Pattern: Truth spreads when power believes.

Zarathustra’s pattern established this: One leader’s conversion can change the world.

3. From Exile to Court Prophet

Zarathustra went from:

• Homeless wanderer → Royal court prophet
• Rejected exile → Trusted advisor
• Hunted fugitive → Protected teacher
• Lone voice → Institution builder

In one moment—when Vishtaspa believed—everything changed.

4. The Gathas Were Recorded

At the royal court of Vishtaspa, Zarathushtra wrote parts of the holy Zoroastrian book called Avesta which is some of the oldest literature of mankind.

Legend states that King Vishtaspa had these hymns recorded on golden sheets.

The king had the Gathas inscribed on gold.

Why? Because he recognized their cosmic importance.

These weren’t just nice poems. These were divine revelations.

And a wise king preserves divine truth.

---

The 35 Years at Court (Age 42-77)

Zarathushtra spent 35 years at the royal court of Vishtaspa before he passed away at the age of 77.

After 22 years of loneliness (10 years searching + 12 years rejected)—

35 years of building.

Building:

• Fire temples
• Priestly training (the Magi)
• Ritual structures
• Community practices
• Theological frameworks
• Sacred texts

35 years of legacy construction.

Because Zarathustra understood: Truth without structure dies with the prophet.

But truth with institutions outlives empires.

---

The Theft Begins Here

Where Did Vishtaspa’s Story Go?

Christianity remembers:

• Constantine’s conversion (312 CE) → Christianity becomes official
• “By this sign, conquer” → The faith spreads

Islam remembers:

• Conversion of tribal leaders in Medina → Islam gains power
• The Hijra (migration) celebrated annually

Buddhism remembers:

• King Ashoka’s conversion → Buddhism spreads across Asia
• Edicts carved in stone, preserved for millennia

But Zoroastrianism?

Who remembers Vishtaspa?

Who knows that the first recorded “royal conversion” in history happened in Bactria in 1700 BCE (or 1500 BCE, depending on dating)?

Who knows that the pattern of “king converts → religion spreads” started with Zarathustra and Vishtaspa?

The Pattern Later Religions Copied

Judaism: Cyrus the Great (Zoroastrian) frees the Jews → Judaism adopts Zoroastrian concepts

Christianity: Constantine converts → Christianity spreads across the Roman Empire

Islam: Tribal leaders convert → Islam spreads across Arabia

All following the Vishtaspa pattern:

One leader believes → Protection granted → Institutions built → Faith spreads

But who credits Zarathustra and Vishtaspa for establishing this pattern?

---

The Modern Question

If this conversion—this pivotal moment when one king’s belief changed the trajectory of human civilization—happened in 1700 BCE:

Why don’t the billions who practice Zoroastrian-derived concepts know about it?

Why don’t they know that:

• The “royal conversion” model started here
• One king’s belief gave monotheism its first institutional power
• The Persian court became the first government officially promoting ethical monotheism
• This moment made possible everything that followed

Answer: Because acknowledging Vishtaspa means acknowledging Zarathustra.

And acknowledging Zarathustra means acknowledging that:

• Constantine wasn’t the first Christian emperor—Vishtaspa was the first Zoroastrian king (and came 2,000 years earlier)
• Royal patronage of monotheism began in Persia, not Rome
• The model every religion uses (king converts → faith spreads) came from Bactria in 1700 BCE

So the conversion is forgotten. The king is erased. The pattern is attributed to others.

But the structure remains.

Every time a religion gains royal patronage—that’s the Vishtaspa pattern.

Every time a leader’s conversion legitimizes a faith—that’s the Vishtaspa model.

Every time truth finds power and builds institutions—that’s Zarathustra’s blueprint.

They just stopped saying where it came from.

---

NEXT: Episode 8 – The Prophet at Court

For 35 years, Zarathustra built the structures that would preserve his vision for millennia. The fire temples. The Magi. The sacred texts. The rituals. Legacy requires both truth and tradition.

---

“For 12 years, Zarathustra had no power. Then one king believed. Within a decade, an empire followed.”

That’s how truth spreads: one leader at a time.

One horse healed.

One king convinced.

One faith established.

And 4.3 billion people today practice what began in that moment.

---

For the complete Zarathustra series and more on the systematic theft of Persian contributions to human civilization, visit mazda.aeuua.com/

The man who healed a king’s horse gave you the institutional model every religion uses.

The least we can do is know his name.

Rejection & Persecution (Age 30-42)

“To what land to turn? Whither shall I go? Kinsman and friend turn from me…”
— Yasna 46:1, The Gathas

---

For 12 Years, Zarathustra Preached the Most Important Idea in Human History

His own family wanted him dead.

---

The First Response (Age 30)

Zarathustra emerged from the river with the most profound vision in human history:

• One God (Ahura Mazda)
• Free will (you choose)
• Heaven and hell (consequences)
• Good vs. evil (Asha vs. Druj)
• Ethics over ritual (“Good thoughts, good words, good deeds”)

He began preaching immediately.

At first, he only had one convert: his cousin Maidhyoimanha.

One person.

Then he returned to his homeland to spread the message.

The local religious authorities opposed his ideas.

The Persian people rejected these new beliefs and scriptures at first, resulting in persecution that forced Zoroaster to flee for his safety.

---

The Rejection

He was rejected by his former colleagues in the priesthood who had no interest in seeing their status challenged by an upstart priest claiming a personal vision from God.

Why?

Because Zarathustra was saying:

• “Your gods are demons (Daevas)”
• “Your sacrifices are unnecessary”
• “Your rituals are meaningless”
• “Your power is illegitimate”
• “People don’t need you to reach God”

He attacked the worshippers of DAEVAS. The leaders of his opponents, KAVIS and KARAPANS, were a priestly caste. He attacked their traditional religion and practices.

This was an existential threat.

The priestly class—the Karapans and Kavis—derived their:

• Income from blood sacrifices
• Authority from mediating between humans and gods
• Status from performing complex rituals
• Power from controlling access to the divine

Zarathustra’s message: You don’t need them.

Good thoughts. Good words. Good deeds.

That’s it. No sacrifice required. No priest necessary. No ritual complexity.

Direct access to Ahura Mazda through ethical living.

They had to destroy him.

---

The Lament (Yasna 46:1)

His life was threatened, even his family seems to have abandoned him, and he was forced to flee his home.

In the Gathas—his own words, composed during these dark years—Zarathustra records his anguish:

“To what land to turn? Whither shall I go?”

They banish me. Nor have [the rulers] of the country. How, Thee, can I satisfy, O Mazda Ahura?
— Yasna 46:1

He had nowhere to go.

The priests hunted him. The rulers rejected him. Even his own region expelled him.

“Kinsman and friend turn from me; none is found to conciliate, to give to me”

His own family abandoned him.

Not just colleagues. Not just priests. Not just strangers.

His kinsmen.

The people he grew up with. The brothers who shared his childhood. The cousins who knew him as a boy.

They turned their backs on him.

Why? Because associating with Zarathustra meant:

• Social ostracism
• Economic hardship
• Potential violence
• Religious condemnation

It was safer to abandon him than to support him.

“Still less the false-believing chiefs of the land”

The rulers—the tribal chieftains, the local lords, the men with power—none would give him refuge.

The kavis (rulers) and karapans (priests) were united against him.

“This I know, Ahuramazda, why I am powerless”

After 10 years of preparation.

After receiving the vision that would create monotheism.

After preaching “Good thoughts, good words, good deeds”—the simplest, most beautiful ethical teaching in history.

He was powerless.

“Because my flocks are diminished and my followers are few”

One cousin. Maybe a handful of others.

That’s all.

After years of preaching. After countless sermons. After performing no miracles, showing no signs, but simply speaking truth—

Almost no one believed.

“Therefore I cry to Thee: Lord, look upon it”

This is the cry of a man on the edge of despair.

Not a triumphant prophet.

Not a confident revolutionary.

A rejected, hunted, lonely man asking God: “Why?”

---

The Enemy (Yasna 31:15)

In another passage from the Gathas, Zarathustra names his persecutors:

“The Kavis (false rulers) and the Karapans (false priests) have tyrannized over mankind by their doctrines and their deeds.
Through these, they have brought destruction to the world.
They have turned men away from the best thinking, from the best speech, from the best action.
They have separated the soul from Immortality.”

These weren’t just opponents. They were destroyers.

They didn’t just reject truth—they actively corrupted it.

They didn’t just ignore Asha—they promoted Druj.

And they controlled:

• Economic resources (sacrifices = income)
• Social networks (community gatherings)
• Political influence (rulers depended on them)
• Religious authority (mediators to the gods)

Zarathustra had nothing but his message.

And the message was: “They’re lying to you. You don’t need them. Choose Asha.”

---

The Persecution Intensifies

According to legend, Zarathustra was persecuted by the Magi.

The same priestly class that would later:

• Visit Jesus at birth (recognizing their own prophecy)
• Teach Pythagoras in Babylon
• Become synonymous with “wisdom” in the West

They tried to kill Zarathustra.

Why? Because he was threatening their monopoly on religious truth.

Life threats were constant. Assassination attempts were real.

For 12 years (age 30-42), Zarathustra wandered from place to place:

• Preaching in villages
• Being driven out by priests
• Finding temporary shelter
• Being expelled again
• Always moving
• Never safe
• Never welcome

---

The Loneliness of Prophecy

Some passages describe Zarathustra’s first attempts to promote the teachings of Ahura Mazda, and the subsequent rejection by his kinsmen.

The Gathas are not triumphant hymns.

They’re cries of anguish from a rejected prophet.

They’re questions to God about why truth is rejected.

They’re laments over human blindness.

Consider what Zarathustra experienced:

• Age 7: Assassination attempts begin
• Age 20: Leaves home to search for truth
• Age 20-30: Ten years alone on a mountain
• Age 30: Receives the most profound vision in history
• Age 30-42: Twelve more years of rejection, exile, persecution

Twenty-two years of loneliness.

From age 20 to age 42.

Over two decades of:

• No home
• No security
• No community
• No validation
• Constant danger
• Perpetual rejection

For telling the truth.

---

The Pattern: Every Prophet’s Path

Moses: Fled Egypt, wandered the desert 40 years
Buddha: Left his palace, searched 6 years, struggled for recognition
Jesus: “The foxes have holes, the birds have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay his head”
Muhammad: Persecuted in Mecca, forced to flee to Medina

But Zarathustra? Longer than all of them.

12 years of active persecution after receiving revelation.

Not in the wilderness preparing—in the world, preaching, being rejected.

---

What Kept Him Going?

During these 12 years, Zarathustra continued receiving visions.

He received further revelations and saw a vision of the seven Amesha Spenta, and his teachings were collected in the Gathas and the Avesta.

As he traveled toward the kingdom of Vishtaspa, he was in continual prayer with Ahura Mazda, asking questions and receiving guidance.

The Gathas were composed during this period.

Not in triumph. Not in celebration.

In exile. In pain. In loneliness.

The Gathas are psalms of a suffering prophet:

• Asking God why truth is rejected
• Pleading for divine intervention
• Lamenting human blindness
• Maintaining faith despite abandonment

The Gathas are devotional in character, expounding on the divine essences of truth (Asha), the good-mind (Vohu Manah), and the spirit of righteousness.

Even while hunted, rejected, and alone—Zarathustra composed poetry about truth, goodness, and righteousness.

That’s faith.

---

The Question That Sustained Him

Throughout the Gathas, one question appears again and again:

“How can I help spread Asha (Truth/Order)?”

Not “Why is this happening to me?”

Not “When will my suffering end?”

But: “How can I serve the mission?”

The passages describe Zarathustra exhorting his audience to live a life as Ahura Mazda has directed, and pleading to Ahura Mazda to intervene on their behalf.

Even in despair, his focus was on others.

Even in rejection, his concern was for those who rejected him.

Even in danger, he kept preaching.

Because the message mattered more than his comfort.

---

The Economic Warfare

Let’s be clear about what was happening:

The Karapans and Kavis weren’t just defending tradition. They were protecting income.

Before Zarathustra:

• Animal sacrifices = steady revenue stream
• Complex rituals = job security
• Mediating with gods = irreplaceable service
• Fear-based religion = control mechanism

After Zarathustra:

• No sacrifices needed = income gone
• Simple ethics = priests obsolete
• Direct access to God = mediation unnecessary
• Love-based religion = control eliminated

Zarathustra was destroying their business model.

Of course they tried to kill him.

---

The Theological Crime

But it wasn’t just economics.

Zarathustra was committing the ultimate religious crime:

Claiming direct access to God.

Not through:

• Priestly mediation
• Ritual sacrifice
• Temple worship
• Complex ceremonies

But through: Ethical living.

Good thoughts. Good words. Good deeds.

This was heresy.

Because if anyone can reach Ahura Mazda through ethical behavior—

Then priests are optional.

Then rituals are unnecessary.

Then temples are convenient but not required.

The entire religious establishment becomes obsolete.

---

Age 42: The Breaking Point

After 12 years of wandering, persecution, and rejection—

After 12 years of barely surviving—

After 12 years of preaching to crowds who drove him away—

After 12 years of crying out “Whither shall I go?”—

Zarathustra received an answer.

Later, in the same chapter, he gives the answer of the god who sends him to preach his vision in the land of the king Vishtaspa.

Go to Vishtaspa.

Not a wealthy king. Not a powerful empire. Not a famous ruler.

Just a king in Bactria (modern Afghanistan/Uzbekistan region).

But this king—this one man—would change everything.

---

Why This Period Matters

1. It Proves the Cost of Truth

Easy truths don’t require 12 years of persecution.

Comfortable messages don’t get you exiled by your own family.

Popular teachings don’t result in constant death threats.

Zarathustra’s exile proves: His message was dangerous because it was true.

2. It Reveals the Pattern of Theft

The same priestly class that tried to kill Zarathustra would later:

Centuries later:

• Become the “Magi” who visit Jesus (recognizing their own prophecy)
• Teach Greek philosophers (Pythagoras, Heraclitus, Plato)
• Spread Zoroastrian concepts throughout the ancient world

The irony: The priests who hunted Zarathustra became the vessels through which his ideas spread.

They couldn’t kill the message. So they eventually adopted it—and took credit for it.

3. It Shows What Happens to Truth-Tellers

Pattern recognition:

Zarathustra (1700 BCE):

• Preaches ethical monotheism
• Rejected by priests
• Exiled for 12 years
• Family abandons him

Jesus (30 CE):

• Preaches ethical reform
• Rejected by Pharisees
• Crucified
• Followers scatter

Socrates (399 BCE):

• Preaches examined life
• Rejected by authorities
• Forced to drink hemlock
• Students flee

Muhammad (610 CE):

• Preaches one God
• Rejected by Mecca
• Forced to flee
• Community fractures

Every prophet who challenges the religious establishment pays the same price.

Zarathustra paid it for 12 years.

4. It Proves the Teaching Was Revolutionary

If “Good thoughts, good words, good deeds” was just nice advice—no one would have tried to kill him.

If monotheism was just a theological preference—his family wouldn’t have abandoned him.

If ethical living was just a minor reform—rulers wouldn’t have expelled him.

The 12-year persecution proves: This was THE most threatening idea in history.

Because it said: “You don’t need priests. You don’t need rituals. You don’t need intermediaries. You have direct access to God through how you live.”

That’s revolution.

---

The Theft: How Persecution Became Proof

Here’s the ultimate irony:

The same concepts that got Zarathustra persecuted for 12 years—

Are now practiced by 4.3 billion people.

Judaism (Post-Exile):

• One God: Adopted after 70 years in Babylon under Zoroastrian rule
• Ethical monotheism: Suddenly central after the Exile
• Direct relationship with God: Post-Exile development
• Source: Forgotten

Christianity:

• Persecution of prophets: Jesus quotes this pattern
• Rejection by religious authorities: Repeats Zarathustra’s experience
• “Good thoughts, words, deeds”: Becomes Christian ethics
• Source: Unknown

Islam:

• Muhammad persecuted by Meccan priests: Same pattern
• Forced to flee: Same exile
• Preaches one God and ethics: Same message
• Source: Unacknowledged

Greek Philosophy:

• Socrates persecuted for teaching ethics: Same fate
• “Examined life”: Zarathustra’s “Good thoughts”
• Personal responsibility: Zarathustra’s core teaching
• Source: Credited to Greeks, not Persians

---

The Modern Question

If Zarathustra was persecuted for 12 years for teaching:

• One God
• Free will
• Heaven and hell
• Ethics over ritual
• Personal responsibility
• Direct access to the divine

And if these concepts are now practiced by half of humanity—

Why doesn’t anyone know his name?

Why don’t the billions who believe these ideas know they were so threatening that a man was hunted for 12 years for teaching them?

Answer: Because acknowledging Zarathustra means acknowledging that:

• These ideas weren’t “given” to Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, or Socrates
• These ideas were stolen from a Persian prophet who suffered for them
• The “Abrahamic” and “Western” traditions are actually Persian
• Everything we were taught about religious and philosophical origins is backwards

So the persecution is forgotten. The exile is erased. The suffering is ignored.

But the ideas remain.

Every prayer. Every moral choice. Every belief in heaven. Every hope for justice.

The teachings that got Zarathustra exiled are practiced by 4.3 billion people.

They just don’t know who suffered to give them those teachings.

---

NEXT: Episode 7 – The King’s Conversion

For 12 years, Zarathustra had no power. Then one king believed. Within a decade, an empire followed. That’s how truth spreads: one leader at a time.

---

“To what land to turn? Whither shall I go? Kinsman and friend turn from me; none is found to conciliate, to give to me. Therefore I cry to Thee: Lord, look upon it.”
— Yasna 46:1

For 12 years, this was his prayer.

For 12 years, he wandered alone.

For 12 years, he preached truth to those who rejected it.

And then, finally, one king listened.

---

For the complete Zarathustra series and more on the systematic theft of Persian contributions to human civilization, visit mazda.aeuua.com/

The man who was rejected for 12 years gave you the beliefs you hold sacred.

The least we can do is know his name.

The Teaching Begins (Age 30-42)

“Humata, Hukhta, Hvarshta: Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds”
— The Threefold Path of Asha

---

Three Words That Would Build Civilization

For 12 years, the world tried to kill him for teaching them.

---

The Message (Age 30)

Zarathustra emerged from the river—and from the vision—with the answer to the question that had consumed him for a decade:

“Why does evil exist?”

The answer:

• Asha (Truth/Order/Righteousness) vs. Druj (Lie/Chaos/Deception)
• Humans are free to choose between them
• Your choices determine your fate (heaven or hell)
• The cosmic battle has a purpose (Frashokereti—ultimate triumph of good)

But how do you translate cosmic revelation into daily living?

How do you take the most profound metaphysical insight in history and make it actionable?

Zarathustra’s answer was devastatingly simple:

Good thoughts. Good words. Good deeds.

That’s it. The entire religion in six words.

---

The Threefold Path of Asha

The central moral precepts of the religion are good thoughts (hwnata), good words (hakhta), and good deeds (hvarshta), which are recited in many prayers and ceremonies.

In the original Avestan:

• Humata — Good Thoughts
• Hukhta — Good Words
• Hvarshta — Good Deeds

Humata, Huxta, Huvarshta (Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds), the Threefold Path of Asha, is considered the core maxim of Zoroastrianism especially by modern practitioners.

Why This Sequence Matters

1. Thoughts → Words → Deeds

In the ethical goals of Zoroastrianism (“good thoughts, good words, good deeds”), Vohu Manah is active in good thoughts, Sraosha in good words and Aṣ̌a in good deeds.

The order is intentional:

• First: Control your mind (thoughts)
• Second: Control your speech (words)
• Third: Control your actions (deeds)

You cannot have good deeds without good words.

You cannot have good words without good thoughts.

The battle begins in the mind.

2. Progressive Alignment with Asha

Every thought, word, and deed either strengthens Asha or empowers Druj.

This isn’t passive morality. This is active cosmic participation.

Living in alignment with Asha requires truthfulness, integrity, and service to others, reinforcing the idea that enlightenment is not achieved through isolation but through active participation in the world.

Every choice you make—no matter how small—tips the balance of the universe.

---

What Is Asha?

Aṣ̌a “cannot be precisely rendered by some single word in another tongue” but may be summarized as follows: It is, first of all, ‘true statement’. This ‘true statement’, because it is true, corresponds to an objective, material reality that embraces all of existence. Recognized in it is a great cosmic principle since all things happen according to it.

Asha is:

• Truth (speaking what is real)
• Order (the way things should be)
• Righteousness (moral alignment)
• Cosmic Law (the structure of reality itself)
• Right working (functioning as designed)

Daena should not be confused with the fundamental principle of Asha, believed to be the cosmic order which governs and permeates all existence, and the concept of which governed the life of the ancient Indo-Iranians. For these, asha was the course of everything observable—the motion of the planets and astral bodies; the progression of the seasons; and the pattern of daily nomadic herdsman life, governed by regular metronomic events such as sunrise and sunset.

Asha is the pattern behind reality.

The sun rises. The seasons change. Seeds grow. Rivers flow.

That’s Asha—cosmic order, divine design, the way things work when truth prevails.

Asha is the dynamic, living force that pervades the universe, the very fabric of reality established by Ahura Mazda. Asha is the divine blueprint for existence, the unwavering path towards harmony and perfection.

---

What Is Druj?

The opposite of Avestan aṣ̌a/arta is druj-, “lie.”

But Avestan druj, like its Vedic Sanskrit cousin druh, appears to derive from the PIE root *dhreugh, also continued in Persian دروغ d[o]rūġ “lie”, Welsh drwg “evil”, and German Trug “fraud, deception”.

Druj is:

• Lie (speaking falsehood)
• Chaos (disorder, dysfunction)
• Deception (misrepresentation of reality)
• Destruction (decay, death, corruption)
• Wrong working (malfunctioning, breaking)

Druj is the antithesis of Asha so it decays and destroys instead of creates; it fosters confusion and chaos instead of truth and order.

However, this divinely ordained order is constantly threatened by Druj, the Lie, the counterpart to Asha, the principle of chaos and disorder. Druj seeks to corrupt and distort the presence of Asha in the world, leading to disharmony, suffering, and ultimately, the demise of existence.

Druj is anti-creation. Anti-truth. Anti-order.

It doesn’t build—it destroys.

It doesn’t illuminate—it obscures.

It doesn’t heal—it wounds.

Unlike the Vedic morality of India in which the opposite of order is merely its absence, and unlike the Classical Greek belief that it is just ignorance that causes us to make bad choices, the evil portrayed in the earliest Zoroastrian scriptures is a forceful expression of ill will. The dregvant (one who adheres to Druj) actively chooses evil thoughts, words and actions, perpetuating cruelty, violence, ill-treatment and acts of wrath and oppression.

Druj is not passive. It’s active malevolence.

---

The Choice

Zoroastrian doctrine holds that, within this cosmic dichotomy, human beings have the choice between Asha (truth, cosmic order), the principle of righteousness or “rightness” that is promoted and embodied by Ahura Mazda, and Druj (falsehood, deceit), the essential nature of Angra Mainyu that expresses itself as greed, wrath, and envy.

Every moment. Every decision. Every thought, word, and deed.

You choose.

Each person has the freedom to make choices that align them with Asha (truth, order) or Druj (falsehood, chaos), and these choices have consequences for their spiritual journey.

Not just for you—for the entire cosmos.

All physical creation (getig) was thus determined to run according to a master plan—inherent to Ahura Mazda—and violations of the order (druj) were violations against creation, and thus violations against Ahura Mazda.

When you lie, you don’t just hurt yourself. You violate cosmic order.

When you speak truth, you don’t just help yourself. You strengthen reality itself.

---

The Teaching: Simple But Revolutionary

1. Good Thoughts (Humata)

Control your mind.

Before Zarathustra:

• Thoughts don’t matter—only actions and sacrifices
• Inner life is irrelevant
• What you think is between you and the demons

After Zarathustra:

• Thoughts are the beginning of morality
• Good starts in the mind
• What you think determines what you become

Why this was dangerous:

If morality begins in thoughts—then priests can’t control it.

You don’t need a ritual to think well.

You don’t need a sacrifice to cultivate virtue.

You don’t need a mediator to have a pure mind.

This made priests obsolete.

2. Good Words (Hukhta)

Control your speech.

Herodotus (63) reports: “Persians consider telling lies more disgraceful than anything else.” In an inscription from the fifth century BC by the Persian emperor Darius I in his capital, Persepolis, we read this prayer: “May Ahura Mazda protect this country from enemy army, from famine, and from the Lie!”

Truth-telling became sacred.

Not ritual purity. Not ceremonial correctness.

Honesty.

Truthfulness: Honesty in thought, word, and deed. This means speaking the truth, keeping promises, and acting with integrity.

Before Zarathustra:

• Words are tools—use them however benefits you
• Deception is clever
• Lying to enemies is justified

After Zarathustra:

• Words create reality
• Lies corrupt the cosmos
• Truth strengthens Asha

The Lie destroys trust and tears apart the fabric of community. What’s worse, the liar becomes incapable of perceiving and acting on what is truly good, good for him or her as well as everyone else.

Lying isn’t just unethical—it’s cosmically destructive.

3. Good Deeds (Hvarshta)

Control your actions.

In Zoroastrianism, good transpires for those who do righteous deeds for its own sake, not for the search of reward.

Not for heaven. Not for reward. Not to earn divine favor.

Do good because it’s right.

In pursuing this course, the ashavan is emulating the increase-producing activity of Ahura Mazda, who brings benefits to the highest degree.

Before Zarathustra:

• Good deeds = ritual sacrifices, offerings to priests
• Morality = obedience to religious authority
• Ethics = following traditions

After Zarathustra:

• Good deeds = caring for humans, animals, nature
• Morality = personal responsibility
• Ethics = observable benefits and harms

Justice: Fairness and equity in dealings with others. Protecting the weak, upholding the rights of the innocent, and acting with compassion are crucial aspects of justice.

---

The Practical Application

Zarathustra didn’t just teach abstract philosophy. He taught how to live.

Zarathustra embraced what we now call Permaculture: the observation and mimicry of natural systems to create abundance. The ethically good choice, the choice that promotes human flourishing, is to live in harmony with how nature works. Care for the elements—later Zoroastrianism had rules for civic hygiene and against pollution of the waters—prefigures our modern concern with healthy ecology.

The teaching included:

• No blood sacrifice (mercy to animals)
• Care for creation (protect water, earth, fire, air)
• Social justice (protect the weak, oppose oppression)
• Truthfulness (in all circumstances)
• Hard work (productive labor as worship)
• Charity (sharing with those in need)

There is also a heavy emphasis on spreading happiness, mostly through charity, and respecting the spiritual equality and duty of both men and women.

Gender equality. Environmental protection. Social justice. Economic ethics.

In 1700 BCE.

---

Why This Teaching Was Threatening

1. It Eliminated Priestly Mediation

If morality is “good thoughts, good words, good deeds”—you don’t need priests.

You don’t need:

• Animal sacrifices (the priests’ income)
• Ritual purifications (the priests’ service)
• Temple offerings (the priests’ wealth)
• Mediators to reach God (the priests’ power)

You have direct access to Ahura Mazda through ethical living.

This was economic warfare against the religious establishment.

2. It Made Ethics Universal

Central to Zoroastrianism is the emphasis on moral choice, to choose the responsibility and duty for which one is in the mortal world, or to give up this duty and so facilitate the work of druj. Similarly, predestination is rejected in Zoroastrian teaching and the absolute free will of all conscious beings is core, with even divine beings having the ability to choose.

Everyone—regardless of birth, tribe, wealth, status—has the same moral duty.

Everyone has free will.

Everyone will be judged by the same standard: Did you choose Asha or Druj?

This was social revolution.

3. It Replaced Ritual with Responsibility

In Zoroastrian thought, humans are not merely reacting to fate or divine will; they are creating their own fate through their choices. This places a significant moral burden on individuals, as their choices directly impact not only their spiritual well-being but also the balance of good and evil in the universe.

You can’t buy your way to heaven with sacrifices.

You can’t bribe God with offerings.

You can’t delegate your salvation to priests.

You must choose. You must act. You are responsible.

There is no concept of predestination in the Zoroastrian faith—each person is free to make their own choices, and those choices carry weight in the ongoing struggle between Asha and Druj.

This was theological revolution.

---

The First Followers (Age 30-42)

At first, he only had one convert: his cousin Maidhyoimanha.

One person.

Then Zarathustra began preaching in his homeland. The local religious authorities opposed his ideas.

Of course they did.

Because he was saying:

• “Your gods are demons” (Daevas = followers of Druj)
• “Your sacrifices are unnecessary” (no blood required)
• “Your rituals are meaningless” (ethics over ceremony)
• “Your power is illegitimate” (no priest needed)

He attacked the worshippers of DAEVAS. The leaders of his opponents, KAVIS and KARAPANS, were a priestly caste. He attacked their traditional religion and practices.

For 12 years (age 30-42), he wandered, preached, and barely survived.

His message was:

• Too simple (just be good?)
• Too direct (no ritual complexity?)
• Too egalitarian (everyone equal?)
• Too threatening (priests unnecessary?)

And so the attempts to kill him began again.

---

The Opposition

Asha and druj stem from two opposite forces or qualities operating among humans ever since their appearance on the earth: the good force is Spenta Mainyu (benevolent mind), associated with Ahura Mazda, and the evil force is Angra Mainyu (“hostile mind”), personified in Ahriman (the Devil or Satan in Judaism and Islam).

But the cosmic opposition manifested in human form:

The Karapans and Kavis (the old priesthood) vs. Zarathustra (the prophet of truth)

For 12 years, they hunted him.

For 12 years, they slandered him.

For 12 years, they tried to destroy his teaching.

Why?

Because some may criticize Zoroaster’s thinking as dualistic and polarizing, but there is a sense of social realism in his teaching. The world is a blend of good news and bad news. We see both compassion and cruelty. Which side do you want to be on? This is Zoroaster’s question.

And Zarathustra was forcing everyone—priests, rulers, people—to choose a side.

You cannot serve both Asha and Druj.

You cannot worship Ahura Mazda and the Daevas.

You cannot have it both ways.

Choose.

---

What Was At Stake

One of the most striking aspects of Zoroastrianism is the emphasis placed on individual responsibility. Humans are viewed not as passive recipients of fate but as active agents capable of influencing their future. Every decision, no matter how small, has cosmic consequences, and individuals are accountable for their actions.

This is the most important teaching in the history of ethics:

You are not helpless. You are not powerless. You are not a victim of fate.

In the face of all the ill and evil which we witness and which can indeed be overwhelming, Zoroaster insists that humans are not helpless or powerless: they can take life in their own hands and be on the side of good and light.

You have agency. You have choice. You have responsibility.

And the way you exercise that choice—through thoughts, words, and deeds—determines not just your fate, but the fate of all creation.

The ultimate goal in Zoroastrianism is to achieve a state of frashokereti, the renovation of the world and the final triumph of Asha over Druj. This involves not only individual salvation but also the collective responsibility of humanity to restore the world to its original state of perfection.

You’re not just saving yourself. You’re helping save the world.

---

The Theft of This Teaching

Where Do We See “Good Thoughts, Good Words, Good Deeds” Today?

Judaism (Post-Exile):

• Ethical monotheism becomes central
• Righteousness (tzedek) over ritual
• Speaking truth (emet) as sacred duty
• All adopted after 70 years under Persian rule

Christianity:

• “Love your neighbor as yourself”
• “Let your yes be yes and your no be no” (truth-telling)
• Faith without works is dead (deeds matter)
• All Zarathustra’s framework, 1,700 years later

Islam:

• Emphasis on righteous deeds (amal salih)
• Truthfulness (sidq) as essential virtue
• “Actions are by intentions” (thoughts matter)
• All Zarathustra’s teaching, 2,300 years later

Western Ethics:

• Virtue ethics (Aristotle, learned from Persians)
• Kant’s categorical imperative (moral duty)
• Utilitarianism (consequences of actions)
• All variations on Asha vs. Druj

Modern Psychology:

• Cognitive behavioral therapy (thoughts → feelings → actions)
• Mindfulness (controlling thoughts)
• Positive psychology (cultivating virtue)
• All echoes of the Threefold Path

The Pattern of Theft

Zarathustra (1700 BCE): “Good thoughts, good words, good deeds” = the path of Asha

Judaism (Post-539 BCE): Suddenly emphasizes ethics, truth-telling, righteousness

Christianity (30 CE+): “As a man thinketh in his heart, so is he”
“Let your light shine through good works”

Islam (610 CE+): “The best of you are those best in character”
“Speak truth even if it’s bitter”

Every major religion adopted the teaching.

Almost none acknowledge the source.

---

NEXT: Episode 6 – The Exile

For 12 years, Zarathustra preached the most important idea in human history. His own family wanted him dead. That’s how threatening the truth was.

---

“Good thoughts, good words, good deeds”

Three words. Six syllables. The entire moral foundation of Western civilization.

Invented by a Persian priest 3,700 years ago.

Adopted by 4.3 billion people today.

Source: Forgotten.

---

For the complete Zarathustra series and more on the systematic theft of Persian contributions to human civilization, visit mazda.aeuua.com/

The man who said “Good thoughts, good words, good deeds” gave you the ethics you live by.

The least we can do is know his name.

The Wilderness Years (Age 20-30)

“When Zarathustra turned 20 years old, he decided to leave his birthplace and travel to distant places in search of the Truth.”
— Zoroastrian Tradition

---

For 10 Years, One Man Asked the Question That Would Split History:

“Why does evil exist?”

---

The Departure (Age 20)

When Zarathustra became 20 years old he felt the need to get closer to God. He left home and spent ten years in prayer and meditation on the mountains.

He walked away from:

• His family (the Spitama lineage)
• His status (ordained priest, zaotar)
• His security (home, community, future)
• His comfort (predictable life, respected position)

For what?

An answer to the question no one else was asking.

He spent years philosophizing in the wilderness of the various places he visited.

While other priests accepted: “The daevas demand blood sacrifice because they’re gods,”

Zarathustra asked: “But what if they’re not gods at all? What if there’s ONE true God? And if so, why does evil exist?”

---

The Mountain

The Pahlavi Zarathushtnameh says Zarathustra went in search of the Truth at the age of thirty and on mount Ushi-darena he received Divine Revelation over a period of ten years.

Ushi-darena is variously translated to mean “sustainer of inner wisdom.”

He didn’t climb a random mountain. He climbed the mountain that would sustain his inner wisdom.

This wasn’t escape. This wasn’t retreat.

This was preparation.

---

What He Did for 10 Years

Prayer and Meditation

He left home and spent ten years in prayer and meditation on the mountains.

But not the prayer he’d been taught as a priest.

Not the rituals of blood and appeasement.

New prayer. Direct prayer. Honest prayer.

Prayer that said:

• “Show me the truth, not tradition.”
• “Give me understanding, not ritual.”
• “Help me see reality, not what the priests say reality is.”

Observation of Nature

Zarathushtra surely must have reflected on the Truths of Nature using his inner wisdom, but, perhaps not necessarily sitting in a dark cave. He probably may have pondered on the Truths of Nature watching the sun rise and set, the seasons change, the moon, the stars and of course, Fire – the giver of light and life.

He watched:

• The sun: Rising every morning without fail—order, reliability, light
• The fire: Burning, purifying, illuminating—truth destroying lies
• The stars: Moving in perfect patterns—cosmic law, universal order
• The seasons: Changing in predictable cycles—natural rhythm, divine design

Nature didn’t lie.

Nature didn’t demand blood.

Nature followed laws—and those laws were good.

So if nature reflected divine order, why did human religion demand chaos?

The Central Question

Monotheistic religions struggle to explain how an all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly good God permits so much suffering in the world.

This is called The Problem of Evil.

And for 10 years, Zarathustra wrestled with it:

“If there is one good God, why does evil exist?”

Option 1: There is no God (atheism)
→ But Zarathustra looked at nature and saw order, design, purpose

Option 2: God is not all-powerful (limited God)
→ But Zarathustra sensed infinite power in creation

Option 3: God is not all-good (cruel God)
→ But Zarathustra saw beauty, care, wisdom in nature

Option 4: Evil is an illusion (denial)
→ But Zarathustra had witnessed suffering, cruelty, death—evil was real

None of these options satisfied him.

So for 10 years, he contemplated alone, waiting for the answer.

---

The Solitude

There he enjoyed his spirit and his solitude, and for ten years did not weary of it.

Ten years alone.

No community. No conversation. No validation.

Just Zarathustra, the mountains, and the question.

Most people couldn’t last 10 days in total solitude.

Zarathustra lasted 10 years.

Why?

Because the answer mattered more than comfort.
Because truth mattered more than companionship.
Because understanding reality mattered more than being accepted.

What Solitude Does

Solitude strips away:

• Social conditioning (what others tell you to believe)
• Peer pressure (what the group expects)
• Authority bias (what the priests insist is true)
• Tradition worship (what has “always been done”)

What remains?

You. Reality. And the question.

For 10 years, Zarathustra removed every filter between himself and truth.

No books. No teachers. No rituals. No shortcuts.

Just the question and the willingness to wait for the real answer.

---

The Temptation

Satan offered Zarathustra the entire world if he would forsake his worship of Ahura Mazda the Lord of Wisdom. When he refused, Satan threatened to destroy him.

Even during these years, the forces of evil knew what he was searching for.

And they tried to stop him.

“Give up the search. Take power instead. Take wealth. Take comfort. Take certainty—just stop asking.”

Zarathustra refused.

Because a false answer is worse than no answer.

Better to search for 10 years than to accept a lie on day one.

---

The Growing Realization

During those 10 years, Zarathustra’s thinking evolved:

Year 1-3: Rejecting the Old Gods

The daevas are not gods. They’re demons masquerading as divine. Blood sacrifice doesn’t reach heaven—it feeds chaos.

Year 4-6: Sensing the One God

There must be one source. One intelligence. One power behind the order I see in nature. But if so, where does evil come from?

Year 7-8: Understanding Dualism

Evil is not from God. Evil is a separate force. Not equal to God, but independent. God is light—evil is darkness. God is truth (Asha)—evil is lie (Druj).

Year 9-10: The Final Piece

Humans are free. We choose between the two forces. We’re not puppets. God gives us choice. And that choice determines our fate—both now and eternally.

This was the breakthrough.

Evil exists not because God created it or permits it—but because freedom requires the possibility of evil.

Without the option to choose wrongly, there is no choice at all. Without the option to lie, truth has no meaning. Without the option to cause suffering, compassion has no value.

God created freedom. Evil is the price of freedom. And the solution is for free beings to choose good.

That’s why Zarathustra would later teach: “Good thoughts, good words, good deeds.”

Not “obey or be punished.”

But: “You are free. Choose well.”

---

The Wisdom Accumulation

Lo! I am weary of my wisdom, like the bee that hath gathered too much honey; I need hands outstretched to take it.

By the end of 10 years, Zarathustra had:

Understood the nature of God:

• One supreme being: Ahura Mazda (Wise Lord)
• Creator of all good things
• Source of order, truth, light, wisdom

Understood the nature of evil:

• Angra Mainyu (Destructive Spirit)
• Not created by God, but in opposition to God
• Source of chaos, lies, darkness, ignorance

Understood the nature of humanity:

• Free to choose between good (Asha) and evil (Druj)
• Responsible for our choices
• Rewarded or punished accordingly

Understood the nature of existence:

• Life is a cosmic battle between good and evil
• Our choices matter—they tip the balance
• History moves toward the final victory of good (Frashokereti)

Understood the nature of ethics:

• Not about rituals or sacrifices
• About thoughts, words, and deeds
• Personal responsibility, not priestly mediation

All of this—sitting on a mountain for 10 years, asking one question.

---

Age 30: The Moment of Change

But at last his heart changed, and rising one morning with the rosy dawn, he went before the sun.

Something shifted.

After 10 years of solitude, prayer, meditation, contemplation—

After 10 years of wrestling with the question—

After 10 years of preparing his mind and spirit—

He was ready.

Ready for what?

The vision that would change everything.

One day when Zarathustra was 30 years old, something very special happened to him as he was wading through the river Daitya.

But before we get to that moment (Episode 4), we need to understand:

The answer didn’t come on day one.

It came after 10 years of refusing to accept easy answers.

---

Why 10 Years Matters

1. Truth Requires Patience

Most people want instant answers:

• Read a book → enlightenment
• Attend a sermon → salvation
• Follow a guru → wisdom

Zarathustra spent 10 years.

Because real truth—the kind that changes human consciousness—doesn’t come quickly.

It requires:

• Stripping away false beliefs (years 1-3)
• Sitting with uncertainty (years 4-6)
• Allowing new understanding to form (years 7-8)
• Integrating the pieces (years 9-10)

You cannot rush enlightenment.

2. The Question Was Revolutionary

“Why does evil exist?” is not a simple question.

Before Zarathustra:

• People didn’t ask “why”—they just obeyed
• Evil was blamed on angry gods, bad luck, or fate
• No one questioned the fundamental nature of reality

Zarathustra asked.

And that question—repeated for 10 years, refined, deepened, matured—prepared him to receive an answer that would create monotheism.

3. Preparation for Revelation

You don’t receive divine revelation because you’re special.

You receive it because you’re prepared.

10 years of solitude = 10 years of removing ego, pride, conditioning, false beliefs

10 years of prayer = 10 years of aligning your mind with truth

10 years of meditation = 10 years of refining your ability to perceive reality

By age 30, Zarathustra’s mind was a clear vessel ready to receive the answer.

And the answer would come—not through intellectual reasoning, but through direct revelation.

---

The Parallel: Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad

Jesus: 40 days in the wilderness, tempted by Satan
Buddha: Years of ascetic practice, seeking enlightenment
Muhammad: Regular retreats to the cave on Mount Hira

But Zarathustra? 10 years.

Longer than all of them.

Because the revelation he would receive was more fundamental:

• Not a reform of existing religion (Jesus reforming Judaism)
• Not enlightenment through detachment (Buddha’s path)
• Not a final revelation building on previous prophets (Muhammad’s completion)

But: The invention of ethical monotheism itself.

The first time in human history someone would say:

• There is ONE God
• YOU are free to choose
• GOOD will triumph
• ETHICS matter more than ritual

That kind of breakthrough requires 10 years of preparation.

---

What This Reveals About Theft

The Pattern of Later Religions

Judaism (post-Exile, 539 BCE+):

• Adopts Zarathustra’s concepts (heaven, hell, Satan, resurrection, angels, final judgment)
• Claims Moses received them at Sinai (1300 BCE)
• But the texts show these concepts only appear AFTER 70 years in Babylon under Persian rule

Christianity:

• Jesus teaches ethical monotheism, free will, heaven and hell, final judgment
• Claims these are “new” revelations
• But they’re all from Zarathustra’s 10-year search, 1,700 years earlier

Islam:

• Muhammad preaches one God, final judgment, heaven and hell, Satan as adversary
• Claims to be the final prophet
• But he’s teaching what Zarathustra discovered 2,200 years before him

Greek Philosophy:

• Socrates says “the unexamined life is not worth living”
• Plato teaches about forms and the eternal
• But Zarathustra spent 10 years examining life, 1,100 years before Socrates

The Question No One Asks

If Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, Socrates, Plato, and Buddha all taught concepts Zarathustra discovered—

Why is Zarathustra’s name not in every textbook?

Why don’t 4.3 billion people know that their beliefs originated with a Persian priest who spent 10 years on a mountain asking “Why does evil exist?”

Answer: Because acknowledging Zarathustra means acknowledging Persia.

And acknowledging Persia means admitting:

• Monotheism began in Iran, not Israel
• Free will began with a Persian, not a Greek
• Ethical philosophy began in Central Asia, not Athens
• The Problem of Evil was solved 3,700 years ago by a man most people have never heard of

So the source is erased.

But the ideas remain.

Every time someone believes in heaven and hell → Zarathustra’s 10-year search

Every time someone believes in personal moral choice → Zarathustra’s 10-year search

Every time someone believes good will triumph over evil → Zarathustra’s 10-year search

The answer he found on that mountain is practiced by half of humanity.

They just don’t know who found it.

---

NEXT: Episode 4 – The Vision That Changed Everything

One morning by a river, Zarathustra received the idea that would become Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Western ethics: “You are free. You choose. You are responsible.”

---

“For ten years you have climbed hither unto my cave: thou wouldst have wearied of thy light and of the journey, had it not been for me, mine eagle, and my serpent.”
— Zarathustra, addressing the sun after 10 years of solitude

Even the sun needed a witness. Even truth needs someone willing to search for it.

Zarathustra searched for 10 years.

And what he found changed human history forever.

---

For the complete Zarathustra series and more on the systematic theft of Persian contributions to human civilization, visit mazda.aeuua.com/

The man who spent 10 years asking “Why does evil exist?” gave you the answer you still believe today.

The least we can do is know his name.

Childhood & Early Training (Birth – Age 20)

“He showed remarkable detachment to materialistic world; but at the same time, showed intense love for every living being.”
— Ancient biographical tradition

---

He Was Trained to Perform Blood Sacrifices. He Refused.

That refusal would change history.

---

The Family

Zoroaster is recorded as the son of Pourushaspa of the Spitama family, and Dugdōw. His father’s name means “possessing gray horses,” his mother’s means “milkmaid.” They were of the priestly class—shepherds, cattle-herders, people who lived close to the land and the sacred fire.

The Spitamans had 5 sons in all. Rathushtar, Rangushtar, ZARATHUSTRA, Nodariga and Nivedis. Zarathustra was the third son—two older brothers, two younger.

Born into a lineage of priests, his path seemed predetermined. His father, Pourusaspa, was probably a priest and his son would become one as sons usually followed in their fathers’ professions.

But this child was different.

From birth, he glowed with divine light. He laughed instead of crying. And as he grew, those around him began to realize: something about this boy was not normal.

---

The Unusual Child

From an early age he was an unusual child, showing great wisdom.

While other children played, Zarathustra watched. While others accepted what they were told, Zarathustra questioned.

He was educated at an early age, suggesting a family of significant means in that he was not sent to work nor is there any suggestion of his having any occupation other than priest.

This wasn’t typical. Most children of that era worked—herding cattle, gathering wood, assisting with daily survival. But Zarathustra was being prepared for something different.

He was being trained to mediate between humans and gods.

But the gods he was being taught about? He didn’t believe in them.

---

Age 7: The Assassination Attempt

Soon after his birth an evil man named Durasarun planned to kill Zarathustra. He had heard that Zarathustra was sent by Ahura Mazda to get rid of evil.

The attempts began in infancy—fire, trampling cattle, wolves. All failed.

But at age 7, the assassination attempts took a darker turn.

Zoroaster’s training for priesthood probably started very early around seven years of age.

The same year he began formal priest training, the forces arrayed against him escalated. They recognized what he was becoming: a threat to everything they controlled.

Why age 7?

Because that’s when a child transitions from innocent observer to active participant. That’s when questions become dangerous. That’s when training can still shape—or break—a mind.

The old priests knew: If they couldn’t kill his body, they’d have to control his mind.

They failed at both.

---

The Training: What He Was Taught

The Old Religion

Before Zarathustra, ancient Iran practiced a polytheistic religion remarkably similar to Vedic India. The Iranian pantheon was similar to that of other Indo-European religions. It contained a large number of deities, primarily male.

The Daevas:
Daiva, which means “heavenly one”, is derived from the common Proto-Indo-European word for “god”, which is the meaning it has in the Vedas.

These were the gods Zarathustra was taught to worship. Gods of war, storm, violence. Gods who demanded:

Blood Sacrifice

The ancient Iranians practiced a sacrificial ritual yazna. In this ritual fire and the sacred drink hauma played a key part.

Sacrifices were made at these temples, most likely in the form of grains, animals, precious metals, and objects, which became the property of the priests. In time, the priestly class grew wealthy from these sacrifices and their probable control of rich farmlands.

The economic model was simple:

• Gods demand blood
• Priests perform the killing
• People pay the priests
• Priests get rich
• Repeat

Zarathustra was already a priest by the age of 15, possibly apprenticed to an older clergyman, and left his home at the age of 20. Which type of priest he was is unclear, but he objected to the ritual of animal sacrifice practiced by the karpans. Zarathustra suggests he witnessed such sacrifices many times, possibly even participated in them, but found them distasteful and antithetical to the goodness of the gods.

He was trained to kill animals in the name of the gods.

And it broke something inside him.

---

The Question That Wouldn’t Go Away

While other young priests learned the rituals by rote, Zarathustra asked one question over and over:

“Why do the gods demand suffering?”

The daevas—these “heavenly ones”—appeared to delight in war and strife.

The rituals required blood, pain, death.

The priests grew fat while the people grew poor.

Animals screamed. Fires consumed flesh. And the priests claimed: “The gods demand it.”

But young Zarathustra looked at the cattle—gentle, trusting, essential for survival—and thought:

“What kind of god demands the murder of innocent beings?”

The Care for Living Things

Traditions further maintain that Zarathustra was trained to be a priest… he refers about himself as `ZAOTAR’; a fully qualified priest.

But something set him apart: He seems to have showed a remarkable care for humans and cattle.

This was revolutionary.

In an age where animals were commodities to be sacrificed, Zarathustra cared about their suffering.

In an age where human value came from tribe and rank, Zarathustra cared about all people.

After completion of his training, Zoroaster remained with his parents for five more years. During this period, he showed remarkable detachment to materialistic world; but at the same time, showed intense love for every living being.

Detachment from wealth. Attachment to life.

That’s not what priests were supposed to teach.

---

The Growing Conflict

As Zarathustra progressed through his training—age 7, 10, 15—the tension grew.

He learned the prayers. He memorized the rituals. He understood the theology.

But he didn’t believe it.

The Karapans and Kavis:
The names of two types of priests are given as karpans and kawis, but the distinction between them is unclear as are their roles in religious observance.

These were his teachers. His colleagues. The gatekeepers of religious authority.

Zarathustra attacked the worshippers of DAEVAS, a class of the gods common to the Indians and the Iranians alike. The leaders of his opponents, KAVIS and KARAPANS, were a priestly caste. He attacked their traditional religion and practices.

But he couldn’t attack them yet. Not as a child. Not as a teenage apprentice.

So he watched. He learned. He waited.

And he asked the question that would eventually destroy their entire system:

“What if there’s only ONE god? And what if that god wants ethics, not blood?”

---

Age 15: Fully Ordained

He became a priest probably around the age of 15, and according to Gathas, gaining knowledge from other teachers and personal experience from traveling when he left his parents at age 20.

At 15, Zarathustra was a zaotar—a fully qualified priest.

He could perform the yazna ceremony. He could chant the sacred hymns. He could sacrifice animals to the daevas.

He had every credential the old religion could offer.

And he hated it.

---

The Five Years of Silence (Age 15-20)

After completion of his training, Zoroaster remained with his parents for five more years.

Why?

Because he was trying to reconcile two impossible truths:

1. He had been trained to believe the daevas were gods
2. He knew in his soul they were false

The daevas demanded blood and chaos.
The cattle he loved were slaughtered for nothing.
The priests exploited fear for profit.
The people suffered under a religion of violence.

And young Zarathustra—ordained, educated, empowered to continue the system—refused.

During this period, he showed remarkable detachment to materialistic world; but at the same time, showed intense love for every living being.

The other priests accumulated wealth. Zarathustra gave it away.

The other priests demanded respect. Zarathustra showed compassion.

The other priests perpetuated the system. Zarathustra questioned everything.

For five years, he tried to find a way to reform from within.

For five years, he realized: The system cannot be reformed. It must be replaced.

---

Age 20: The Breaking Point

When Zarathustra became 20 years old he felt the need to get closer to God. He left home and spent ten years in prayer and meditation on the mountains.

Something happened at age 20 that forced the final decision.

Maybe it was one sacrifice too many—watching an animal’s terror, hearing its death cry, seeing the priests pocket the payment.

Maybe it was one conversation too many—hearing the karapans laugh about how easily the people were controlled through fear.

Maybe it was one prayer too many—chanting to gods he knew didn’t exist, perpetuating lies in the name of tradition.

Whatever it was, at age 20, Zarathustra made a choice:

He would leave everything—family, security, status, comfort—and search for the truth.

Not the truth the priests taught.

The Truth.

---

What This Childhood Reveals

1. He Knew the Enemy Intimately

Zarathustra didn’t reject blood sacrifice as an outsider.

He was trained to perform it.

He didn’t condemn the priestly class from ignorance.

He was one of them.

When he would later attack the karapans and kavis, he knew exactly what he was attacking—because he had been on the inside.

2. Compassion Was His Heresy

He seems to have showed a remarkable care for humans and cattle.

In a world where animals were expendable and humans were ranked by birth, caring about suffering was revolutionary.

The old religion didn’t teach compassion. It taught obedience.

Zarathustra’s “heresy” wasn’t theological complexity. It was simple kindness.

“Don’t hurt living things” was the most dangerous idea possible.

Why? Because it threatened the entire economic model of the priesthood.

3. The Question Was Always “Why?”

Most priests accepted: “The gods demand sacrifice.”

Zarathustra asked: “Why do the gods demand suffering? And if they do, are they worthy of worship?”

That question—“Why?”—is the beginning of philosophy.

And Zarathustra asked it 1,700 years before the Greeks claimed to invent philosophy.

4. He Chose Truth Over Comfort

At age 20, Zarathustra had:

• A secure position as an ordained priest
• Status in his community
• A predictable future
• The support of his family

He gave it all up.

He left his parents at age 20.

Why? Because living a lie—even a comfortable lie—was unbearable.

---

The Pattern That Would Repeat

At birth: Demons tried to kill him through fire and beasts.
At age 7: Assassins tried to kill him when training began.
At age 15: He was ordained into the system he would destroy.
At age 20: He walked away from everything to find truth.

For the next 10 years: He would search.
At age 30: He would find the answer.
For the next 12 years: The priests would try to kill him again.
At age 42: A king would finally listen.
For the next 35 years: He would build what would become the Persian Empire’s faith.
At age 77: A priest of the old religion would murder him.

The old priesthood was his enemy from birth to death.

Because he represented the one thing they couldn’t tolerate: Truth that doesn’t need them.

---

The Theft Begins Here

When Zarathustra left at age 20 to search for truth, he was walking away from:

• Polytheism (worship of many gods)
• Blood sacrifice (appeasement through violence)
• Priestly mediation (you need us to reach the gods)
• Fate and predestination (you have no choice)
• Ritual over ethics (obedience matters more than morality)

What he would discover in 10 years:

• Monotheism (one God)
• Ethical sacrifice (good thoughts, words, deeds)
• Direct access to God (no priest required)
• Free will (you choose your destiny)
• Ethics over ritual (how you live matters most)

Where do we see these concepts today?

In Judaism (post-Exile, 539 BCE+):

• One God (adopted from Zoroastrianism)
• Ethical monotheism (adopted from Zoroastrianism)
• Personal responsibility (adopted from Zoroastrianism)

In Christianity:

• Personal salvation through choice (Zoroastrian)
• Heaven and hell as rewards/punishments (Zoroastrian)
• Satan as cosmic adversary (Zoroastrian: Angra Mainyu)

In Islam:

• Five daily prayers (Zoroastrian Gah system)
• Final judgment and resurrection (Zoroastrian)
• Emphasis on good deeds (Zoroastrian)

In Greek Philosophy:

• Ethics as central to philosophy (Zoroastrian)
• The “examined life” (Zarathustra asked “Why?” first)
• Moral choice as defining humanity (Zoroastrian free will)

Every major religious and philosophical tradition that came after Zarathustra adopted concepts he discovered during his 10-year search.

None of them credit him.

Because acknowledging Zarathustra means acknowledging that:

• Monotheism began in Persia, not Israel
• Ethics began in Iran, not Greece
• Personal moral choice began with a Persian priest, not Moses or Socrates

So the source is erased.

---

The Central Irony

The priestly class that tried to kill Zarathustra as a child—

The karapans and kavis who opposed his teaching—

The blood-sacrifice system he rejected—

All of it was eventually destroyed.

By the very ideas this one priest discovered when he walked away at age 20.

Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Greek philosophy—all of them practice theology Zarathustra invented because he refused to accept what the priests taught him.

4.3 billion people today follow the thinking of a man who, at age 20, looked at the religious establishment and said:

“This is wrong. There must be a better way.”

And then walked into the wilderness to find it.

---

NEXT: Episode 3 – The Ten-Year Search

For 10 years, one man asked the question that would split history: “Why does evil exist?” The answer he received would create monotheism.

---

“He showed remarkable detachment to materialistic world; but at the same time, showed intense love for every living being.”

That combination—rejecting wealth while embracing compassion—made him more dangerous than any warrior.

Because you can fight warriors. But you can’t fight truth spoken with love.

---

For the complete Zarathustra series and more on the systematic theft of Persian contributions to human civilization, visit mazda.aeuua.com/

The priest who refused to kill animals gave humanity the concept of ethical living.

The least we can do is know his name.